Diesel or Petrol engines?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

In NZ Diesel is still under half the price of petrol per litre.

However, Diesel engines in aircraft, there was the JU 86 and as well this beastie

bv138.jpg


Technical data (BV 138C-1)

Type: Long-range Maritime Reconnaissance Flying Boat

Power Plant: Three Junkers Jumo 205 D six-cylinder vertical opposed-piston compression-ignition two-stroke engines, each rated at 880hp for take-off. TWO-STROKE F'R GOODNESS SAKE!

Armament: One 20-mm MG 151 cannon in bow turret, one 20-mm MG 151 cannon mounted in turret in hull tail, and one 13-mm MG 131 machine gun on open position aft of central engine, plus (optional) one 7.9-mm MG 15 machine gun firing through hatch in starboard side of hull. (Offensive) Three 110-lb. bombs on racks beneath the starboard wing centre section, or (U1) six 110-lb. bombs or four 331-lb. depth charges.

Performance:
maximum speed: 177 m.p.h. at sea level (at 31967 lb.)
normal cruising speed: 146 m.p.h. at 3280 ft.
climb to 10390 ft.: 24 min.
service ceiling at 31967 lb.: 16400 ft.
service ceiling at 38912 lb.: 9185 ft.
normal range: 758 miles at 122 m.p.h.
maximum range: 2670 miles with 825 Imp. gal.
normal endurance: 6.5 hrs
maximum endurance: 18 hrs

Weights:
empty: 25948 lb.
normal loaded: 31967 lb.
maximum loaded: 38912 lb.

Dimensions:
span: 88 ft. 4.25 in.
length: 65 ft. 1.5 in.
height: 19 ft. 4.25 in.
wing area: 1205.558 sq. ft.

Versions

Prototypes:
Ha 138 V1 - (D-ARAK), flew 15.7.37
Ha 138 V2 - (D-AMOR), flew 8.37, redesigned
Ha 138 V3 - never completed, scrapped

Models:
BV 138A-0 - 6 delivered 1939, 1st flew 2.39, one modified to B-0 standard
BV 138A-1 - 25 delivered 1939-40, 1st tested 4.40
BV 138B-0 - 10 delivered 1940, normal loaded weight increased from 30313 lb. to 31930 lb.
BV 138B-1 - 21 delivered from 12.40, Jumo 205 D engines, increased defensive armament
BV 138B-1/U1 - offensive load increased, see armament above
BV 138C-1 - delivered from 3.41, structural strengthening, four-bladed airscrew, a 13-mm MG 131 replaced the 7.9-mm MG 15 machine gun, and an optional 7.9-mm MG 15 could be added. Some were later fitted with the FuG 200 Hohentwiel radar. About 70 BV 138C-1 were fitted with with catapult points for operation from the Luftwaffe's seaplane tenders.
BV 138C-1/U1 - similar to B-1/U1 version
BV 138MS - few BV138C-1 were converted to minesweepers in 1942-43, no armament, dural hoop used to sweep mines (see image above).

Production:
1939: Blohm Voss (Finkenwerder), 6
1940: Blohm Voss (Finkenwerder), 49
1941: Blohm Voss (Finkenwerder), 79; Weser Flugzeugbau (Einswarden), 1
1942: Blohm Voss (Finkenwerder), 59; Weser Flugzeugbau (Einswarden), 66 (total for 1942/43)
1943: Blohm Voss (Finkenwerder), 30; Weser Flugzeugbau (Einswarden), 66 (total for 1942/43)

Units:
Küstenfliegergruppe 406
Küstenfliegergruppe 506
Küstenfliegergruppe 906
Seeaufklärungsgruppe 125
Seeaufklärungsgruppe 126
Seeaufklärungsgruppe 129
Seeaufklärungsgruppe 130
Seeaufklärungsgruppe 131
Küstenflieger-Ergänzungsstaffel 138
Minensuch-Gruppe 1 der Luftwaffe
Kampfgruppe zur besonderen Verwendung 108

Exports: No exports

Preserved aircraft: None survives today.

Kiwimac
 
ok, a plane's endurance is how long it can stay in the air non-stop, this planes endurance is 18 hours, that means it can fly for 18 hours non-stop, the crew however wouldn't have been able to fly for 18, they would have to stop and land of they would fall asleep "at the weel", thus they would have to stop before the plane................
 
Lanc, the crew wouldn't have had to stop, for a start 18 hours would mean 9 hours out and 9 hours coming home, in theory. So, you would either change crew, or they would just fly for 18 hours. You can stay awake for 18 hours quite easily, as on average you stay up 16 hours a day anyway.
The Tu-95 'Bear' had an endurance of over a day if I remember correctly, and some of their missions from Russia to probe British air space lasted over 20 hours.
 
All of the modern American heavies have demonstrated an ability to fly around the world thanks to airborne refueling. The only limiting factors being crew endurance and oil.
 
Yes but the endurance of a plane is without air to air. The Tu-95 is still one of the best planes in the world, and is still the fastest turbo-prop aircraft.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back