Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I would say no, or at least not to 100 percent. There's a lot of decent literature regarding the Russ-Georgian relations available in Russian language ,and I'm looking now for some good English stuff.Dont you base your opinion on so called "experts" as well?
yes and actually some of them are my information sources as well, on both sides.I mean I think the only people that can a true perspective on what is going on, are those that are there.
This bloody massacre was conceived not by Russia, and not Georgia. She was conceived in the White House by the USA.
I would say no, or at least not to 100 percent. There's a lot of decent literature regarding the Russ-Georgian relations available in Russian language ,and I'm looking now for some good English stuff.
As for actual development of the situation in Georgia, I must admit nobody has a complete picture, neither in Georgia nor in Russia.
The problem is we don't have any objective coverage from a third party. All information is gained either from russian or from georgian sources.
yes and actually some of them are my information sources as well, on both sides.
I don't see it the same way - the 1968 invasion was a blatant aggression by the Soviet Union to keep one of its satellites in place. Czechosloviakia did nothing but bring on reforms that probably would of seen her leave the iron curtain.
Georgia acted first in this incident and that's been confirmed by all sides. It was just plain dumb to roll troops into South Ossetia and think Russia wasn't going to do anything about it.
You know Mitya, up to now I could agree with a lot of your points but that statement is flat out ignorant to the point where If I start seeing more absurd bullshit like that posted here, not only will I close this thread but I will ban people as well - I'm only saying this once.This bloody massacre was conceived not by Russia, and not Georgia. She was conceived in the White House by the USA.
of all wars Milos, Viet Nam, the mid-east in it's many facets, Sudan, everywhere
people and usually the innocents ............ DIE
there is never anyway of getting around it
You know Mitya, up to now I could agree with a lot of your points but that statement is flat out ignorant to the point where If I start seeing more absurd bullshit like that posted here, not only will I close this thread but I will ban people as well - I'm only saying this once.
And no - the CIA is not making me do this!
You know Mitya, up to now I could agree with a lot of your points but that statement is flat out ignorant to the point where
Point taken and thank you!Well I must say to our American members that not all Russians share Mitya's point of view. Even the USA has clearly supported the Georgian goverment since quite a long time the invasion in South Ossetia was solely Saakashvilis decision. In fact they warned him about the possible consequences.
About the pics.
It looks like the jeep type vehicle with the body next to it is the same vehicle that is burned out in later pictures.
Just an observation.
I don't see it the same way - the 1968 invasion was a blatant aggression by the Soviet Union to keep one of its satellites in place. Czechosloviakia did nothing but bring on reforms that probably would of seen her leave the iron curtain.
Georgia acted first in this incident and that's been confirmed by all sides. It was just plain dumb to roll troops into South Ossetia and think Russia wasn't going to do anything about it.