Melbourne Model Expo (2010)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Next up F-86 Sabre "The Huff"
 

Attachments

  • 33_F86_0531.JPG
    33_F86_0531.JPG
    59.2 KB · Views: 93
  • 34_F-86F_0532.JPG
    34_F-86F_0532.JPG
    57.4 KB · Views: 77
  • 35_F-86F_0533.JPG
    35_F-86F_0533.JPG
    53.8 KB · Views: 85
  • 36_F-86F_0540.JPG
    36_F-86F_0540.JPG
    58.3 KB · Views: 87
  • 37_F-86F_0630.JPG
    37_F-86F_0630.JPG
    66.6 KB · Views: 86
This one was commended....But there is something about it that just ain't right...don't get me wrong it is a real good build.....comments?
 

Attachments

  • 42_F4-J_0535.JPG
    42_F4-J_0535.JPG
    88.5 KB · Views: 70
  • 41_F4-J_0539.JPG
    41_F4-J_0539.JPG
    68.7 KB · Views: 78
  • 40_F4-J_0631.JPG
    40_F4-J_0631.JPG
    84.8 KB · Views: 76
  • 39_F4-J_0538.JPG
    39_F4-J_0538.JPG
    59.8 KB · Views: 74
  • 38_F-4 Phantom_0534.JPG
    38_F-4 Phantom_0534.JPG
    81.5 KB · Views: 76
First off, it is a very nice model, presumably 1/32nd scale?
However, as Wayne stated, there's something not quite right, the first being the out of context display base - that detracts at least 50% from the presentation.
The attempt at weathering to portray the really worn look of a carrier-borne aircraft started quite well, but has been ruined by over definition of the panel lines - a lighter tone, and not as heavy, would have complimented the paint fading perfectly. Also, the distinctive multiple tones of the bare metal of the 'stabilators' is not shown, the latter being rather bright, and the over-shiny tail area and drag 'chute housing look out of place. Not sure about the Sidewinders - even early models had a different coloured seeker head, but I could be wrong on this point.
Final verdict - a model which, although very good, could have been superb.
 
Yep, that's what I meant by all the line work being too heavy. The rivets would show around their circumference, when close up, due to moisture trails etc, as would the panel lines, particularly around areas of increased or disturbed air flow, such as hinges, antenna etc. But the whole lot is too pronounced, making it look like a printed card model. Also, check the anti-slip walkways on the top of the engine sponsons - not one sign of wear, tear, or staining. There should be at least some semblance of use here, plus the trails down the sides of the fuselage, left by the rubber heels of the ground/deck crew's boots. All of these things need to tie in, in order to make the overall finish believable, and appear 'right'.
The major detraction on first view is the base - even for a carrier aircraft visiting a land base, it's not a 'believable' scene. Why cobbles, why so narrow, how come the grass is as neat as a bowling green, and where is the aircraft heading to? Perhaps it's made a visit to the local golf club, and is heading out to the first green ?!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back