Crimea_River
Marshal
Because!!!!!!!!!!!!Why????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Because!!!!!!!!!!!!Why????
I think the main reason for the atomic bomb at that time was the fact that the USSR finally declared war on Japan. The west did not want the USSR to expand their sphere of influence to the Far East like they did in Eastern Europe, so they had to make Japan surrender at that time , effectively denying the Soviets a reason to fight there and conquer land.
There are so many reasons for afore mentioned "decisions"; none of them are true/right/ correct, nor opposite.I like this website! There are two points in US history I Disagree with! I think it was wrong for President Truman to order the Atomic Bombings of Japan! I also think the US had no business going to Vietnam! French Indo-China tried to leave France, and France decided to get tough! Today one Vietnam, is being run successfuly by Communists and French Indo-China is Gone!
Christopher Tarana
I do have Age of Empires 1 and 2, as well as Combat Flight Simulator 2 and 3! All the DOS games I run using Defend Reloaded!There are so many reasons for afore mentioned "decisions"; none of them are true/right/ correct, nor opposite.
Not only read more, but also play more!!!
Crusader Kings / Hearts of Iron IV / The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (some of main quest line and the civil war quests and story) ...
Also there is a game called "RealPolitiks", if not mistaken, Give it a try.
And don't forget, all of Life, is nothing more than a game, itself.
Steam link for "RealPolitiks":
Realpolitiks II Deluxe Edition on Steam
store.steampowered.com
I think the main reason for the atomic bomb at that time was the fact that the USSR finally declared war on Japan. The west did not want the USSR to expand their sphere of influence to the Far East like they did in Eastern Europe, so they had to make Japan surrender at that time , effectively denying the Soviets a reason to fight there and conquer land.
Knowing the enemy has a weapon is different then see it used with that devastating effect i think. Even for uncle joe.Not only that, those two bombs were a message to Stalin: we've got one big goddamned stick here.
Of course, with hindsight we know that Stalin already knew of the atomic program, but Truman and others didn't know that then, so sending this message at the expense of the Japanese was part of the rationale, I believe.
That's what I learnt at school exactly, Marcel.I think the main reason for the atomic bomb at that time was the fact that the USSR finally declared war on Japan. The west did not want the USSR to expand their sphere of influence to the Far East like they did in Eastern Europe, so they had to make Japan surrender at that time , effectively denying the Soviets a reason to fight there and conquer land.
It's a dangerous subject indeed. But I believe most of the reasons here were indeed behind the reasoning then. Remember, these were different times. After years of war and millions of dead, the allies had no reason to feel compassion for the Japanese, who had shown to have no compassion for them either. I believe that in a war like that, your enemy becomes that inhuman being.The war was over without A-bombs though I understand your minds for justification.
People live in such a fantasy like "I was right" or "We were right!!!".
People seem to forget that far more lives were lost in the fire-bombings of Tokyo than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.When you total up the number of lives that were regrettably lost in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and weigh that against the millions of lives that would have been lost both American and Japanese, it became the only logical decision. Growing up around any number of Pacific Theater veterans, they all said one thing. They were glad that the bombs were dropped because they felt that they would have died during an invasion.
So did the many people suffering from radiation sickness and cancer. I don't believe the Nuke is anything more humane than the fire bombing.And unlike the instant death that the atom bombs caused, the conflagration caused by the incendiary raids were a slow, horrible death.
I only mentioned a historical fact objectively, Marcel.It's a dangerous subject indeed. But I believe most of the reasons here were indeed behind the reasoning then. Remember, these were different times. After years of war and millions of dead, the allies had no reason to feel compassion for the Japanese, who had shown to have no compassion for them either. I believe that in a war like that, your enemy becomes that inhuman being.
The Allies had their reasons for dropping the bomb that seemed perfectly justified at the time, just like the Japanese had their reasons for starting that horrific war, which to them, I'm sure, were perfectly logical too. Wether all these horrible deeds were indeed justified, only God knows I'm afraid.