drgondog
Major
question. the 109 with wing arms is that from 9/11 confirmed ............or ? this might be a III./JG 300 crate but not sure.
no pik-as emblem on the cowling, II. gruppe wore it though but they were not in the area of the engagement.
black bands but not sure what color the vertical bar was as yet.
yes black numerals quoted in the losses records from 11th staffel and yellow for 9th staffel.
well one thing that sucks is that photos of bf 109G-6's are in the trees and heavily camo'd I cannot see a band or bar or really any markings at all.
E ~
Short answer - No it is not confirmed for 9/11.
The stills I have posted were unlabelled copy frames from his film that a friend copied before sending to GD. I labelled them in my images based on attempts to reconstruct the days based on the Encounter reports after GD lost the film...
Collectively, there are 8 separate '109's' film stills in hand.. two are w/gondolas, 5 do not, one is a high deflection with what seems to be a wing tip missing. Of the 8, six are confirmed, one probable and one damaged.
Of the destroyed, two were on the deck. The Probable was at some middle altitude. The Damaged was on the deck and almost certainly the one that was streaming coolant on 9/11
The two with Gondolas' seem to be 'paired' with respect to altitude - and my guess was 9/11 based on a pair. If they do belong together, the date could also be 6/20.. based on your prior help, the units on 6/20 were probably JG 300 between Berlin and Rugen... or JG300 or ?? else in Marburg to SW Kassel area.
Gotz's directive to strip gondolas seems to make JG53 on 9/11 unlikely for the Gondol stills. If JG300 109s also had all removed by 9/11 - then that pair of ships more than likely is from 6/20.
This very helpful to me in reconstruction.. both unit and type.