Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
A quick response from me would be I can think of no reason that I would allow my daughter at that age to be photographed. Until they reach the age of 18 I'm the adult and guardian of her and I make the decisions. I can't think of anything short of a medical reason. Not art.
The board's decision comes only two weeks after they deemed acceptable nude photos of a 16 year-old girl found in Russh magazine. After investigating the pictures, which depicted the girl sharing a bubble bath with a 15 year-old boy and included four champagne bottles in close proximity, the board said the publication "does not need to be classified."
Unbelievable. What I find disturbing is the Australian laws on this. The classification board needs to be looked into.
They need to deem these images as completely unacceptable and start arresting these photographers. There is art, porn and child exploitation.
A quick response from me would be I can think of no reason that I would allow my daughter at that age to be photographed.