So in short, no, the US did NOT save Europe, Hitler did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
So in short, no, the US did NOT save Europe, Hitler did.
So in short, no, the US did NOT save Europe, Hitler did.
Himself and Stalin.
Im with Adler on this one.
IMO Hitler declaring war on the US whilst still fighting the USSR was what cost the Germans the war. You can only fight so many...
So in short, no, the US did NOT save Europe, Hitler did.
You're right, Soren, but he himself was the problem in the first place.
I think you mean that the war was inevitable and Europe must concider itself lucky for the fact that it was Hitler who ruled Germany during that war in stead of a more rational man and in that I agree.
I do however not think Hitler was the whole problem. Even if he had been more rational Hitler would not have been able to defeat all the countries that were fighting him. He bit off more than he could chew, yes certainly. However allied hard work won the war.
Okay dokay Adler, then we disagree.
Giving his troops winter clothes in StalinGrad and the Soviet Union would've lost quickly descisively. With the USSR down I can't see what the Allies could've possibly done to stop Hitler from taking Europe. And with the USSR under control Hitler would've also had a gateway into the US via Alaska Canada as-well.
But as it was Hitler just made too many mistakes, and that Goering was the leader of the LW didn't help either... (Dropping supplies to the enemy's troops instead of your own doesn't help you win the war )
Hitler started the different conflicts, he is responsible for the war being lost alone. Had he not declared war on the US so soon he could've bought precious time, and had he given his troops winter clothes he would've taken stalingrad and the USSR would've crumbled.
Giving his troops winter clothes in StalinGrad and the Soviet Union would've lost quickly descisively. With the USSR down I can't see what the Allies could've possibly done to stop Hitler from taking Europe. And with the USSR under control Hitler would've also had a gateway into the US via Alaska Canada as-well.
Gateway to the US????
Now that is a little over the top.
Mkloby,
Why is it a little over the top ? Establish airbases close to Alaska and you don't have to fly that far to reach America. Flying from Germany is more over the top IMO.
Adler,
You mean the US (Canada, NZ, Australia) the UK ? Remember that the USSR is out, the front where 80% of German casualties were sustained isn't there, the US is far away, only Britain is close. After conquering the USSR Germany would have virtually unlimited supplies and manpower to power its warmachine, that means no shortage on fuel or raw materials = lots of big panzers, fast now reliable jets, StG.44's, etc etc. So many projects never finished or even started would've been carried out till completion by the Germans had they conquered the USSR. So how were the Allies ever going to win ?
Yes, the USSR was even more crucial to the fate of Europe than the US UK combined, some 13 million USSR troops, 2.5 million German troops, and over 20 million civilians lost their lives in the east. It was in the east that the most brutal type of war was taking place.
One must never forget how crucial the Russian war effort was to the defeat of Germany, it was like a big sponge soaking up huge amounts of resources from the German armed forces.
Soren said:It was in the east that the most brutal type of war was taking place.