AIRFIX 1/48 Bf109F

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Thanks Guys. The fit of the wings is good on the top, not so good on the bottom. Going to put some plastic card in the gaps to cut down on the putty.

005.JPG
006.JPG


In the background is another of my unfinished builds that I'm trying to finish, a P-47N. I have a photo of it carrying what looks like P-38 wing tanks which were painted Neutral Gray. According to the site the photo is on, these were napalm bombs.(Gotta find the site and the photo, again)

Geo
 
Last edited:
Geo, have you check on the wing dihedral? Following the way you are using for attaching wings may cause that the dihedral can be incorrect.
 
Kinda, sorta looks OK(The tail is aligned with the black border on the left side of the instruction sheet). I know the 3 view is an -E but did the dihedral change from different version?

001.JPG

Untitled.jpg


Geo

EDIT:Then again, it could be a -D
 
Last edited:
Yep.. looking good. However these wing tip seems to go a little bit down.

Here you are a couple drawings for F variant....

bf109f1.gif


messerschmitt_bf_109_f-1.gif


watermark.php
 
Yep. But in the case , the wing dihedral is the angle between horizontal line perpendicular to vertical symmetry line of the fuselage and the main wing datum for airfoils.

bf2he2.jpg
 
Okie Dokie, what I've seen is a dihedral of 6.5° and with the Mk.1 eyeball, I make mine about 5°ish. I measured the wingtip height on a flat surface and got about 12mm+/- on both sides. Close enough for me. Thanks for keeping me in line.

Geo
 
With all the fiddling around to achieve the correct dihedral some gaps opened on the top side but it's not like I haven't used putty before.

002.JPG


The cowl is in two pieces. Is this to allow other versions or Airfix having a laugh at my expense? As there is no engine and there are no other versions, I don't know why the cowls couldn't have been molded to their respective fuselage halves. Having said that, I failed to glue the pieces to their respected halves before I glued the fuselage together More mud.

003.JPG
005.JPG


Geo
 
OK.....getting ready to think about paints. I don't have RLM78, but I do have RLM65 so I pop over to Urban's Color Reference Charts and I find that both colors contain the same two FS numbers.

rlm65-78.JPG


I know FS numbers mean nothing to RLM but is anyone gonna hang me if I substitute 65 for 78 or should I just do it and blame it on your CPU's color recognition.

Geo
 
Last edited:
Bottom is done and judging by the photos, a little more cleanup is required. While I was cleaning up the putty with nail polish remover, i recalled a thread about using it as paint remover, so I tested it on the slopped over paint by the wheel well and voila, il est allé. This paint is from a very old bottle of PollyScale. You'll notice the remover also contains Vitamin E to help fight off viruses and invading bacteria in your models.

001.JPG
002.JPG
003.JPG


Tail feathers and then paint, woot woot!!!

Geo
 
Last edited:
Sorry I made you more confused George. But these FS 35352/35414 seems to be rather the equivalents for RLM65 only. The RLM65 was a kind of greenish colour while the RLM78 Azurblau was the paint of quite intensive bluish tinge. Its equivalant is the FS 35450. Here both of samples.


RLM65 i RLM78.jpg
 
I thought that odd as well Wojtek and do not have RLM78 :( Oh well, I'll do the top side colors first until I get some, possibly Monday. Becoming way too proficient in the art of applying putty, Just a dab on the port side to finish the front. Waiting for the paint to dry and pondering how to mud up the rear of the cowling without destroying to many panel lines.

004.JPG
005.JPG


Geo
 
These are what I have now.....

006.JPG
007.JPG


I'm going to Vancouver on Saturday and will check the hobby stores there. I have Vallejo Model Color #961 and #67, Testors #1508, and Modelmaster Acryl #4788 as the paint I'm looking for,

Geo
 
The Vallejo Sky Blue 961, 67 and the Testors 1508 seem to be a good base to start with. It is possible to make a mixture for the RLM78 if you can't find any proper one.

My reference says: RLM78 Azurblau - Humbrol 47, Gunze H418, Testors enamel 2087 what is the ModelMasterII RLM78 known as Hellblau.
It appears that the Model Master 4788 Hellblau RLM 78 Acryl is nothing more but the acrylic equivalent of the Testors/ModelMaster enamel 2087. So either the 2087 enamel or the 4788 acrylic paint you need.
 
Thank you Wojtek. Though Humbrol 47 would be the easiest paint for me to get, do I trust the contents? Anyhoo...trying to be as diplomatic as possible with a solution on how to putty the rear of the cowling and in the end, the trowel came out.

009.JPG
010.JPG


Geo
 
The best colour would be the Testors/ModelMaster 2087 because it is colour of the Authentic series. The Humbrol 47 is gloss and seems to be a little bit too light.
But if the tinge of the enamel is like in the pic below it can be used.

humbrol_47.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back