Best anti-shipping aircraft?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

a question was raised about the Fw 200's service record..... KG 40. any one of our English friends have access to the records at PRO~KEW ? therein may lie some interesting materials. I'll try to hunt down some info from Freiburg soon
 
This is another version of the Swordfish giving it an
even better ability at detecting enemy vessels.
 

Attachments

  • radar_mounted_swordfish_141.jpg
    radar_mounted_swordfish_141.jpg
    74 KB · Views: 307
Sm79. I think my records are close to your second posting.
The first claimed that he sank two cruisers, the second that two cruisers were damaged which matches. I don't think any cruiser was sunk only by Italian aircraft torpedo attack.
I don't think the RN lost five merchant carriers in the entire war. As for the Orion I don't believe that she was hit by a torpedo. If she had benn she would have had to have been sent to drydock for repairs. That sor tof damage is impossible to hide.
Sorry but we have to agree to disagree on this
 
One other qualification falling under "anti-shipping" was the performance for hunting and sinking the small luggers and motorized barges that hug the coast.

In the SW pacific, the B25, the P39 and the Beaufighter performed well doing this.

One of the reasons the Japanese collapsed in this area was they simply could not keep their garrisons supplied. Just imagine having a freighter offshore loaded with supplies, and no barges available to take off the cargo.
 
I do believe I have asked this before, is that a Beu or Mossie in the upper right of the pic ?
 
Heres some pics I have... Got some from the Picture Album I think...
 

Attachments

  • 0uboat_mossie_rockets_309.jpg
    0uboat_mossie_rockets_309.jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 209
  • atbeau_attack1_165.jpg
    atbeau_attack1_165.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 217
  • atbeau_attack2_631.jpg
    atbeau_attack2_631.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 213
  • atbeau_attack3_827.jpg
    atbeau_attack3_827.jpg
    121.1 KB · Views: 220
  • atbeau_attack_4_133.jpg
    atbeau_attack_4_133.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 226
  • atbeaufighter_attack_713.jpg
    atbeaufighter_attack_713.jpg
    63 KB · Views: 216
  • atblenheim_attack_290.jpg
    atblenheim_attack_290.jpg
    47.9 KB · Views: 229
  • atblenheim_attack_and_crash_627.jpg
    atblenheim_attack_and_crash_627.jpg
    53.2 KB · Views: 222
  • atmitsubishi_g4m1_attack_107.jpg
    atmitsubishi_g4m1_attack_107.jpg
    45.3 KB · Views: 228
  • atmossie_attack_100.jpg
    atmossie_attack_100.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 231
  • atmossie_attack1_136.jpg
    atmossie_attack1_136.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 212
  • atmossie_attack2_112.jpg
    atmossie_attack2_112.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 216
  • atmossie_attack3_380.jpg
    atmossie_attack3_380.jpg
    49.1 KB · Views: 214
Erich,

it is easy to tell a Beau from a Mossie, as in the pic.

Beau - low wing mounting; Mossie - mid wing
Beau - sqd codes above wing; Mossie - behind wing
Beau - fat fuselage; Mossie - thinner fuselage
 
Nonskimmer said:
Beau - radial Hercules engines
Mossie - inline Merlin engines
;)

Beaufighter Mk IIs and Mk Vs had Merlins.

There is more points for IDing the 2 such as the stab position, engine position on wing (Mossie below) and fin/rudder shape but was giving for Erich's pic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back