Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
For what its worth here is part of the passage from the book "Hatching an Air Force" by Peter Ilbery, which prompted me to ask the questions in the first place.
Am I wrong to assume this indicated clear weather, as he was "enjoying the outlook over the channel" and was able to see the FW's approaching at very low level?
To clear it up alittle, I hypothesized that it was SKG 10 based on Pb's post about a Lt. Leoplold Wenger leading the flight. It could have been another unit.
I have found out that a Malcolm V. Lowe, author of several warbird books including one on the Fw 190, was taking personal experiences of that day to write a book about it. Haven't found out if its completed or not.
To clear it up alittle, I hypothesized that it was SKG 10 based on Pb's post about a Lt. Leoplold Wenger leading the flight. It could have been another unit.
Enemy aircraft approached from the South East in brilliant sunshine across the line of flight.
Crumpp, I'll ask again what evidence you have that the weather was too bad for the Germans to fly.
Jafu 2 orders.
So Crumpp, what documents tell you that there were no German operations?
Why don't read the thread, Hop. Not reading it combined with sensationalism will get you ignored.
I am just saying that is hard for the Germans to be bombing Bournemouth when their airplanes are not flying.
Crumpp, your reply to my post was unwarrented and unwelcome, your arrogance has been duly noted.
You seemed to be arguing that there were no attacks on the 23rd. For example:
then people could understand what your latest claim is.
From Page 2:
How about some dates have been mixed up? Maybe the units have been mixed up? It's not SKG 10? How about if we pool our resources we might learn something?
Page 3:
It certainly does not preclude the possibility of other units conducting the mission nor the dates being confused.
The question is WHEN and by WHO.
Crumpp says:
I think either the date is confused with the raid most likely taking place on 30 May 1943 if it was SKG 10.
Another real possibility for the 26th of May is SG101 out of Rhiems. The weather was clearer towards the German border and the Typhoon encounter is almost a direct line between Rheims and Bournemouth.
Eyewitness testimony of the weather in England has no bearing on SKG 10 flying the mission. So no, my contention is not that the eyewitness accounts are wrong. It is just that they have no bearing on the German side of events or Jafu 2 Orders.
You seemed to be arguing that there were no attacks on the 23rd.
Chris Goss says 20 aircraft from II/SKG 10 hit Hastings, at the same time 26 aircraft from IV/SKG 10 hit Bournemouth.
To clear it up alittle, I hypothesized that it was SKG 10 based on Pb's post about a Lt. Leoplold Wenger leading the flight. It could have been another unit.
Bournemouth says it was brilliant sunshine,
IFR producers are fog, low clouds, haze, smoke, blowing obstructions to vision, and precipitation.
Haze is a concentration of salt particles or other dry particles not readily classified as dust or other phenomenon. It occurs in stable air, is usually only a few thousand feet thick, but sometimes may extend as high as 15,000 feet. Haze layers often have definite tops above which horizontal visibility is good. However, downward visibility from above a haze layer is poor, especially on a slant. Visibility in haze varies greatly depending upon whether the pilot is facing the sun. Landing an aircraft into the sun is often hazardous if haze is present.
Wow! Don't even pretend to preach. You ever think that you not reading my post were unwelcome? You know one guy doing that is a nuisance; an entire thread of people doing it is a real pain.
Crumpp
I know you have the typhoons taking out 2 Fws. On your list from Tony Wood does it mention when the typhoons did that?
I ask because Bournemouth was the locations of 11 PDRC (Personnel Despatch and Recieving Centre) which was the receiving station for RAAF aircrew arriving in the UK. From what I can gather six RAAF airmen plus many civilians were killed in the raid. Was this a delibrate attack on RAAF personnel or were they simply in the way of a more important target?
Lots of accomodation for for incoming aircrew from Canada and Australia as its a sea side resortWhy would they have the receiving station there? Wouldn't it be better to put it AWAY from POSSIBLE attacks?