Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Thanks Wildcat!
Well that means it was flown by more than a few pilots and includes the Squadron Leader Wilson if I read that right. Very interesting.
I've found another profile in the "In Action" series, showing A29-1193 the recipient of the artwork. Don't think I can trust the colour description. These were all Olive Drab were they not?
Gratuitous inclusion of John Waddy's kite for Wayne.
Cheers
Thanks for your reply. The lack of the lightning bolt is obvious, but I'm not very familiaer with RAAFHard to say b21ft.
Off hand I would have said that is not a 76 squadron aircraft by lack of lightning bolt across tail and (guessing) style of codes, which don't appear to be the distinctive font, but smaller block.
The detail on this Hasegawa is great, but the way they built this model to make various versions is painfull.
I decided to assemble both halves complete with tail section before sticking them together, however this creates a join line vertically down the centre of the rear fuselage where there shouldn't be a panel line. It stumps me why they didn't add the extra bit just like Curtiss did in '42 - or was that '41. Someone will tell me for sure.
Cheers
Sorry for the slow reply..my second try today. I lost the first reply to the ether earlier today.I think this Kittyhawk is getting ready for it's last flight off the back of a barge.
If this was the case , I don't think it could be 1196 as this aircraft was issued to the Navy in 1948.
What do you think?
Ahh! Thanks for the education!b21ft
Not a problem, an interesting diversion.
As a final comment, I also reckon this a/c had a white tail at some stage. If it was 1196, it would not have received the white theatre markings. Something to consider.
regards
Peter