**** DONE: Spitfire Mk. I P9306 ZP H of No 74 Squadron Battle of Britain Group Build

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Glenn, that's not the yellow leading edge stripe you're seeing, it's the demarcation between the top and bottom colours, mainly the Dark Earth. None of those profiles show the yellow leading edge stripe, and certainly not 'Sneezy's of 74 Sqn. The yellow stripes ran from the joint of the wing tip to the outer edge of where the cannon was fitted on the MkV and, on those remaining MkIIs re-painted in the 'new' scheme, to the line of the inner pair of guns.
I can 100% assure you NO Spits or Hurricanes carried the yellow leading edge ID wing stripes during the BoB - this feature was not introduced until the new 'Day Fighter' scheme came into being, late in 1941, and being made 'official' in early 1942, at which time the colours changed to Dark Green/Ocean Grey/Medium Sea Grey.
The first change to the 'BoB'- type scheme was the 'Sky' spinner and tail band, along with the black underside to the port wing, which was after the Battle, on 27th November, 1940.
 
Sorry to mess you about Glenn. I still can't see any yellow, which would be more prominent due to it wrapping around the wing leading edge, and especially with the red-doped gun patches. I think it's just the way the artist has toned and 'softened' the wing leading edge colours, to show the curvature, and given the apparent accuracy of the rest of each scheme, I can't see any decent profile artist getting it wrong. If it is yellow there, then it is definitely wrong !
If you've sprayed the yellow, it should be thin enough to disappear under the other colours, especially if it's given a very light rub-down with fine grit wet and dry.
 
Sorry to mess you about Glenn. I still can't see any yellow, which would be more prominent due to it wrapping around the wing leading edge, and especially with the red-doped gun patches. I think it's just the way the artist has toned and 'softened' the wing leading edge colours, to show the curvature, and given the apparent accuracy of the rest of each scheme, I can't see any decent profile artist getting it wrong. If it is yellow there, then it is definitely wrong !
If you've sprayed the yellow, it should be thin enough to disappear under the other colours, especially if it's given a very light rub-down with fine grit wet and dry.
 
I agree if not a bit of a pain.

In Glenn's defense, I think the artist got it wrong and that the strip is supposed to represent the yellow edge. Take a look at the two profiles for Unwin's rig QVoH on page one that shows one for Aug 1940 and one for Sept 1940. The latter has the yellow edge and it's clearly excluded on the former. I think he was using the same backgrounds for different profiles but did not take care to make sure they were correct.

Nice site, one that I've had bookmarked for some time, but now that Terry pointed this out I will think twice about relying on it.
 
Thanks Andy. Now I don't think I'm crazy! The yellow in the profile seemed to match exactly the yellow on the leading edge of the aircraft as it is today in the museum (see picture in post #1) so even though it had been repainted in a later camouflage scheme, seeing the yellow in the profile I just went with it. I wish I hadn't seen the profile because I hadn't even thought about it before then and wouldn't have looked at the museum pic to confirm it. Oh well.... shouldn't be too difficult to fix, Just a waist of time doing it in the first place!!
 
Must admit, I didn't look at the other pages (will now), so hadn't seen any with the yellow. If George Unwin's kite is there, with yellow leading edges, then it's definitely wrong ! Apart from the fact that, as already mentioned, the yellow hadn't been introduced in 1940, I've got a DVD with some footage and 'stills', showing George and his Spit - and of course, no yellow!
I find it strange that any artist could make such a fundamental mistake, even if using the same base drawing for all profiles, and even if under the pressure of a deadline ! Had it been a month or so either way, in say 1942, then there might be an excuse, but not in the BoB !!!
 
I'll have a look in both my copies too, and ask Jan to check in the 74 Sqn book I loaned him. The latter has listings of all aircraft used by 74 from WW1 to the 1960s, so, cross-referenced with Shacklady, we can establish which one it's likely to be.
 
Great picture Karl! That does look like the right codes on that last spit in line. Too bad it wasn't a little closer to the camera, but then again I never expected to see a period picture of it at all!
Terry according to the aircraft history in post #1, it didn't receive the "H" until Aug 11, 1940. Would those earlier type markings have been replaced by that date?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

  • Sticky
**** FINISHED: Spitfire Mk. I P9306 ZP H of No 74 Squadron Battle of Britain GB
2
Replies
21
Views
9K
T Bolt
  • Sticky
*** GROUP BUILD #7 Battle of Britain WINNERS - JUDGED COMPETITION ***
Replies
15
Views
8K
Jayl
  • Sticky
  • Poll
MEMBERS CHOICE POLL: Battle of Britain Group Build #7
2 3
Replies
46
Views
13K
Crimea_River
  • Sticky
**** FINISHED: Bf109E-4 Jg2 white 9 Battle of Britain Group Build
Replies
15
Views
7K
T Bolt
**** DONE: Bf109E-4 Jg2 white 9 Battle of Britain Group Build
7 8 9
Replies
174
Views
24K
javlin
Menu
Log in
Register