Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
But doesn't that count as a blunder?
They knew, for some time, that an invasion was coming in the west.
Why then did they build fixed installations, rather than the mobile launchers they used later? If they had been set up to use mobile launchers from the start they would have provided a more flexible system, and may have proved more valuable - especially if targetted at the invasion beachs and the temporary harbour the Allies had set up.
Though i'm sure someone will post that they were just a few weeks from developing a missile to do just that with 100% accuracy.
They knew the invasion was coming, but not where.
Things are developed as they are developed. The long ramps were developed first, the aerial launches and portable ramps were developed as the need come about.
If you look at the V1 and V2 bombardment of Antwerp, which is an example of a closer target. I think it shows neither system was accurate enough to hit the invasion beaches.
Though i'm sure someone will post that they were just a few weeks from developing a missile to do just that with 100% accuracy.
Siegfried good post on the V-1 on the V-1.I would have air launch it from day one.On a second jen one put fuel in the wings and and the pabst ramjet engine.
Wonder if any of the belligerents was messing with passive radio homing, to produce anti-radiation missile?
IMO the abundant quantities of P-38s in late 1942 would've had much more impact to the war than a P-38 of really great performance, in late 1943.
Heinkel He 177 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But I strongly doubt that it would be that advantage for German. I don't see how a single He 177 can do the same job much better than two Ju 88s or He 111.. you do not get but about half the number of heavy strategic bomber than a twin bomber. If France had not fallen, the He 177 would have importance, because basis from England for example would be further. But in practice, the only difference was that He 177s bombing England could do it even from taking off from Germany, just as He 111s could do the same in 1940 by taking off from France bases..
The RAF managed to get the Lancaster and Halifax opperational by Jan 1941. The Stirling and Manchester way before then.
.
the first mission of lancaster was on the night 3/4 march 1942, in january 1941 get the first flight. Halifax first mission was on night 11/12 march 1941, Stirling on 10/11 february 41, Manchester on 24/25 february 41
.........................
German's problem was not the lack of a 4 engined big bomber, it was the the size of their industry in relation to what they were trying to do. Every 4 engined bomber in 1939-40 was TWO He 111s not built. No real increase in bombs on target or in targets that could be hit with any worthwhile tonnage of bombs.
......................
What?
You have doubts?
Didn't you know 'final victory' was imminent ......before everything unfairly stopped that little bit too early denying the world the sight of the true magnificence sheer élan of the technical wonder that was German arms in WW2.
................
Honest, it's all true, I read it in a book.