Shall we bring back the Lurverly Ladies Thread???

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I have stayed away from this thread until now b/c I have read all your comments. For the most part I agree with Eric. I would hate to see our site taken away from kids b/c of some nanny control or something. But I would be ok with it IF it was watched and severe punishment handed down for those who abuse it. It would have to be watched closely b/c some newbie bone head posts porn and is banned .... well like he cares but if that results in us being on a nanny watch.... well we are the ones losing out.

Not sure if this is possable or not but what about this. If you wanted to post pics of a girl you post it but it is not shown until it is approved by a mod first or a site administrator. Not sure if that is possable or not. I am comparing it to a friend who has a web page (he is a fiction writer), he has looked into having a feedback or a guest book on it. What happens is when someone posts a comment he gets to see it first and has to approve it before it is posted on the site. Now he has not gotten the guest book b/c he thinks it would be to much a problem always keeping up with the comments. That might be a problem also if a mod decided to do it. Too much staring at nearly naked girls........ what the heck I am a saying...... can I control it??? Bring on the girls!!!! lol Just kidding

I would be ok with it if controlled carefully. But if it was not here I would not care either. I know where to look if I want to see that.
 
17 : 8

Guys, anyone coming here could post porn at anytime they felt like it, and one of the Mods would catch it within minutes.... It just doesnt happen, which is why I feel it would be ok to bring it back with strict guidelines and punishment for violators.... I am willing to be the responsible moderator for the thread, with some slight help during the daytime hours....

I will reiterate my stance on this.... One screw up and ur gone, its as simple as that.....
 

Good point, would you guys be looking for more Mods then to help patrol during daytime hours or would the current mods handle it all?
 
Over 18...¡¡¡¡¡

Quiet histeric isnt??, do you need to be over 18 when you go to the beach??, do you need to be over 18 in a Victoria Secrets Fashion show??


give me a break.
 
CharlesBronson said:
Over 18...¡¡¡¡¡

Quiet histeric isnt??, do you need to be over 18 when you go to the beach??, do you need to be over 18 in a Victoria Secrets Fashion show??


give me a break.

In Britain you can watch movies with topless women in at 15 and women can model topless at 16, so I agree with Panzerknacker, I think 18 is too high for a thread with no topless ladies in.
 
Tiger said:
In Britain you can watch movies with topless women in at 15 and women can model topless at 16, so I agree with Panzerknacker, I think 18 is too high for a thread with no topless ladies in.

I agree with that...

In France, there is topless beaches all over the place... And no one needs to be 18 to go there. So why would we put a "over 18" disclaimer for non-nude women ?
 
I agree guys, I think the whole problem is not the bikini clad women, but the concern that someone will post a naked pic and it gets spotted by the censors.... Then this site doesnt show up on google search and we lose many people and possible members whose search gets filtered for content....
 
Well like les said, the whole thing about the 18 thing is because the censors guys might think it is not for people younger than 18, people can be @*$ up.

I must say if this will mean that the site will get into trouble because of this I will not be for it, but I do not see that someone of the censors will look at this type of thread as porn or only 18, dam TV has a lot of girls in minimum cloths in ads for anyone to seeand kids see woman in them everywhere.

To see a woman in a bikini and naked is two different things and to see it as adult content is bullsh*t. Just look at ww2incolor where there is such a thread and it is not censored, the pics is links, but still there has never been any porn on there. I found that site on a Google search



Henk
 
Possibly it could be a "filtered entry" thread:
You could only access it if you were a member (threfore not open to general public), and we make it mandatory to enter the date in the submission form, and from this, no-one can enter if they are under a preset age?
maybe...
 

Or a user group? though that may make it seem more like some dodge strip joint! "Members only, no touching!"
 
If you wanted to post pics of a girl you post it but it is not shown until it is approved by a mod first or a site administrator

You could only access it if you were a member (threfore not open to general public)

these both seem like good ideas to me, although i think having to give your age takes it a bit far......
 
and it would turn this site into too much of a ***** nanny state, one of the best things about the internet is that people need know nothing about you, i don't wanna start handing out details..............
 
I like the making it a member only site and Les if it is brought back you know that at most of the times of the day atleast one of us is online to monitor it.

I however do agree with everything that Erich has said so I dont think I am for it or against it. It is something that we moderators need to discuss.
 
Hey I have the perfect answer Les.... bring it back and I get vito to delete anything OTT or under age.

LOL couldn't resist that.

Though I find it a bit sad, boys will be boys,so why not bring it back...... but with firm rules.

cant believe I just said that....must be mellowing in my old age....bless me!

(Can I ban Sunny boy if he kicks off again though.... please,please, lol )
 

Users who are viewing this thread