Shall we bring back the Lurverly Ladies Thread???

DerAdlerIstGelandet · May 20, 2006

Well aslong as people can follow the rules I have no problem with it.

lesofprimus · May 20, 2006

OK so now its 12 : 7 in favor of.....

The three members who are undecided:

The Lanc
planD
R988

syscom3 · May 20, 2006

DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
I just dont want this site to lose track of what it is there for.

If you want to see chicks I say go to:

www.newbienudes.com
www.chickforums.com

I thought Deradler was joking about these two sites untill i clicked on them

DerAdlerIstGelandet · May 20, 2006

Being deployed in the desert gives you plenty of time to look up the ladies in your free time.

plan_D · May 21, 2006

I'm against it, for all the reasons Eric has stated.

lesofprimus · May 21, 2006

12 : 8 in favor.......

102first_hussars · May 21, 2006

As long as detailed and specific rules are put in place and are available to the thread veiwers, there should be no problem, if someone breaks the rules block them from the thread or whatever you guys do- either way this forum is kind of a sausage feast and could use a little bit (PG rated) scandley clad to it, im for it.

lesofprimus · May 21, 2006

13 : 8 in favor...

Royzee617 · May 22, 2006

I am in favour up to a point... but how come the discussion about being risks of being censored only concerns dodgy pix?

Shouldn't these netnannies also be concerned about the ugly hairy (and not so hairy) grunts who wander this site? Never mind the porn, kids who come here for serious homework help etc might be permanently mentally scarred seeing what grown men get up to in their spare time.

Seriously, a few pix of scantily clad ladies is no big deal compared to pictures or videos containing violent scenes. This site is, however, about warfare so it inevitably will feature violence.

lesofprimus · May 22, 2006

14 : 8

pbfoot · May 22, 2006

I would say Ok provided they were approved by the moderators prior to publishing so the the kids here wouldn't be more corrupted then they are

lesofprimus · May 22, 2006

15 : 8 and the gap is widening.......

Henk · May 22, 2006

I think like Les said, horse should make a 18 or over disclaimer and put it there so that the site does not get in trouble.

Henk

lesofprimus · May 22, 2006

I dont think it will eliminate the problem, but it could help...

Remember guys, this little thread does not decide whether or not we bring it back, but gives us Mods and Horse a better idea how the general population feels about it, so we can make the best decision about this for our membership, and the well being of this site....

the lancaster kicks ass · May 23, 2006

will there be a warning on every page/a warning at the top of the page?

lesofprimus · May 23, 2006

If we (Mods) decide to bring it back, yes there will, and it was a great idea that u had.... Im sure horse can arrange it, otherwise I can do it manually for each page....

the lancaster kicks ass · May 23, 2006

high praise indeed i'll think on my vote a bit more........

DerAdlerIstGelandet · May 23, 2006

I not really for it, but with certain controls I would agree to it. As I said if I want to see scantly clad women there are other websites to go to. I come here for WW2 aviation and other stuff.

lesofprimus · May 23, 2006

And chicks in bikinis fall under other stuff..........

evangilder · May 23, 2006

A word of warning on labelling the thread over 18. That is a red flag for the content watchers. Plus, with no mechanism to control that, it won't stop those that are under 18 from going in there.

Shall we bring back the Lurverly Ladies Thread???

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Brigadier General

Pacific Historian

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Lieutenant Colonel

Brigadier General

Tech Sergeant

Brigadier General

Tech Sergeant

Brigadier General

1st Lieutenant

Brigadier General

Master Sergeant

Brigadier General

Major General

Brigadier General

Major General

Private Chemtrail Disperser

Brigadier General

"Shooter"

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads