at6
1st Sergeant
Hey, I'm a guy. If I have to change genders, you'll have to sniff my panties.Sister...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Hey, I'm a guy. If I have to change genders, you'll have to sniff my panties.Sister...
Hey, I'm a guy. If I have to change genders, you'll have to sniff my panties.
I think anyone arguing that lockdown is not efficient is not thinking clearly.
I think a much more interesting debate is how strict this lockdown has to be. So at what point do extra measurements stop being significant.
For instance The Netherlands and Belgium are demographically quite similar. The pandemic reached these countries almost simultaneously. While the Belgians has a very strict lockdown, we had slightly less so. Still in both countries the curve seems to be the same. The number of ICU patients started to decline at about the same moment with the same rate. Based on that, admittedly single, example, one could argue that the extra measures taken by the Belgians were not significant. One could argue that the NL did it slightly better as the little bit more freedom lessened the mental burden for the population.
On the other hand, both countries fared better than Brazil, so both lockdowns seem to be more efficient than doing nothing.
Admittedly this is pure anecdotal evidence, so maybe these observations should be taken with a grain of salt.
One remark about the efficiency of the New Zealand lockdown is that NZ are islands in the middle of a big ocean, while European countries are not. So more has to be considered when comparing countries at how well they did.
Marcel,
I agree, and your ideas were sound, your thought processes were logical and your words were clearly stated and succinct. You did not even attack anyone. That post has no place on social media.
Isn't a forum also social media? Maybe I should remove it then?Marcel,
I agree, and your ideas were sound, your thought processes were logical and your words were clearly stated and succinct. You did not even attack anyone. That post has no place on social media.
Old news. The Chinese claimed this already in February.Now I'm hearing that virus has mutated into a more contagious and deadly form. However, it has also been said that when or if an effective vaccine is developed, the vaccination will still be effective.
Isn't a forum also social media? Maybe I should remove it then?