**** DONE: Spitfire Mk. Vb Trop. BS231 “D” of No 452 Sqn defending Darwin .

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Vic Balshaw said:
Nice stuff Bill, something I've not tried. I take it you get the resin mix through your contact in Adelaide.
Click to expand...

Nope, get it thru a craft supplier that handles all kinds of casting, molding materials. Just look up casting and molding in the phone book. The mold mtrl is a silicon base safe to flesh and is pink. The cast mtrl is a white one. These are both mixed 50/50. The cast is a part A and B, if you get too much B in the mix it will not set. It's pretty easy to use mate.
 

..and I happen to have some from a long time ago. Not a bad idea, thanks!
 
vikingBerserker said:
I'm curious, have you ever tried using the quill to paint fine details such as control panels? I need an untra fine brush and thinking this might have a possibility.
Click to expand...

Sorry VB I failed to answer this question. Goose quills were used for writing when stick ink was ground with water, like Japanese slate dish. Due to the lamp black is suspended in the water as a light solid, it has difficulty flowing from bristles. Although fine Japanese and ancient writing was done by brush, not All of the solids left the bristles. In the old manuscripts, under the the gold of the illuminated letters is a gesso mixture. This was a very viscus mixture of plaster of paris, fish glue, and rock candy ground into a fine powder before mixing all. It is much like the Mr Surfacer in consistency. This gesso mixture was put down on the vellum with a quill because all the solids will flow from it cleanly, and can be controlled into very fine lines. A brush just won't let all the solids flow out. I hope this didn't bore you, and made sense for me trying the quill. Bill
 
Vic Balshaw said:
I have some old calligraphy pens somewhere, think I'll have to give this a try
Click to expand...

Not the calligraphy pens Vic, a "pointed" steel pen nib for the filler. The flat calligraphy type would be too bloody wide for scribed line filling. But you are getting the drift. Bill
 
OK, I will clarify this. Rotring, and Rapidograph are "technical" pens, fillable by an internal reservoir, you would never get the solids of Mr Filler up into them, no less get them to flow out of them.

What I am describing are Non-reservoir pens, see photos. One is a group of typical steel pen nibs, have to inserted into a handle. The second is a real birds feather cut into a writing pen. Rather than the broad square front edge, I used one cut a little more pointed.

I am suggesting trying the steel nibs. Cutting a quill is a bit of an art and needs instruction! Bill
 

Attachments

  • steel pen nibs.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 99
  • pen quill.JPG
    19.6 KB · Views: 97
Last edited:
Ah, got you! I've got a number of those nibs, in different sizes/widths, which I used to use for various tasks. haven't used a quill for donkey's years - was taught how to cut them when I was a kid, fifty years ago!
Come to think of it, we used to have the steel nibs and wooden shanks at school, up until the early 1960s - when good hand writing was essential, and counted towards 'grades' in exams !!
 

Ahhhh.............them were the days mate, ink blobs all over the place and on your fingers
 
I am confused about the bottles behind the seat, on the port side of the Vb.
In the instructions it has these double bottles mounted in the section directly behind on the port side. I have seen Mk.1 cutaways showing them in this section.

Yet when I see a cutaway of the Vb, it shows the 35 gal aux long range fuel tank mounted in this bay behind the seat. The double bottles mounted on the port side in the section behind.

Did All the Vb's have the 35 gal aux tank? Or were they in some operational areas? Would they have been used in GB? And in the case of this Vb converted to Vc had them since it was used in GB before being transferred to Aus?
 

Attachments

  • spit tanks 1.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 85
  • spit tanks 2.jpg
    28.6 KB · Views: 87
The auxilliary tank was not a standard fitting and, AFAIK, not many MkVs had them. You can tell immediately if the tank is fitted, as the filler neck is visible under the small transparency right behind the canopy, with the cap protruding through the perspex.
The twin oxygen cylinders were normally in the location shown in the first cutaway, as they were on all Spits.
 
Ahtso. They were mounted behind the sweat, and under the aux tank If it was installed then?

Velly intelestink!
Thanks for that. I can now paint and install !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

**** FINISHED: 1/48 Spitfire Mk. Vc Trop. “D” of No 452 Sqn defending Darwin .
2
Replies
20
Views
9K
slaterat
**** DONE: 1/48 Hawker Typhoon Mk.1B 245 Sqn "Sharky" Commonwealth Group Build
4 5 6
Replies
110
Views
27K
Crimea_River
  • Sticky
**** FINISHED: 1/48th Spitfire MkVIII, 136 Sqn RAF, Burma, Commonwealth GB.
2
Replies
29
Views
9K
Airframes
**** DONE: 1/48 ICM Spitfire Mk IX AE-B Ian Keltie of 402 SQDN RCAF Commonwealth GB
10 11 12
Replies
237
Views
30K
Crimea_River
  • Sticky
**** FINISHED: Spitfire MvKIII F/L E "Ted" Sly 457 sqn RAAF
2
Replies
22
Views
9K
Wildcat
Menu
Log in
Register